Yes. Article 50 of the EU AI Act cares that your disclosure is present, clear and accurate — not who or what wrote it. Drafting it with ChatGPT or another AI tool is fine, as long as you check the result actually discloses what it needs to, where it needs to.
None of Article 50's obligations regulate how a disclosure is written. They regulate outcomes: under Article 50(1), people must be informed they're interacting with an AI system; under Article 50(4), deep fakes and AI-generated public-interest text must be disclosed as artificially generated or manipulated. And the information has to be given in a clear and distinguishable manner, at the latest at the time of the first interaction or exposure.
So a disclosure drafted by ChatGPT, a colleague or a lawyer is judged the same way: is it accurate, is it clear, and is it where people will see it in time?
General-purpose AI tools write fluent text, but they don't know your site. The failures we'd watch for are about substance, not style:
A general-purpose AI tool drafts from whatever you tell it. The Article50.io report starts from what's actually on your page: it detects the AI chat widget or AI-generated content, maps it to the Article 50 sub-clause it falls under, and gives you ready-to-paste disclosure language with instructions for where to put it. Here's the general shape, using our free generic templates — the report's versions are matched to what the scan actually found on your page:
<div class="chat-ai-banner" role="note">
AI-powered chat · Replies are written by an AI system and may contain mistakes.
</div><p class="ai-text-notice">
This article is AI-generated. It was produced by an AI system
and published without human editorial review.
</p>Prefer to write your own? Use the Article 50 compliance checklist to check the result covers every obligation that applies.
Yes. Article 50 of the EU AI Act requires that the disclosure is there, clear and given at the latest at the first interaction or exposure — it says nothing about who or what drafted the wording. What matters is that the final text is accurate and genuinely tells people AI is involved.
No. A one-line notice like "This is an AI assistant." isn't the kind of content Article 50 targets: it isn't a deep fake, and it isn't text published to inform the public on matters of public interest.
Yes — every finding in the full report comes with a specific fix. Think of it as an AI disclosure language generator tailored to your findings: ready-to-paste disclosure text and plain-English instructions for where to add it on your page.
No. Article50.io provides an automated technical assessment of your website's public-facing content against Article 50's transparency requirements, not legal advice. For a determination of your specific legal obligations or compliance strategy, consult a qualified lawyer.
Article50.io is an automated Article 50 transparency assessment platform that scans websites for potential EU AI Act transparency obligations and provides remediation guidance, implementation instructions, and compliance-ready disclosure language.
The free scan shows your single most severe finding in about 30 seconds — no signup, public pages only.
Automated technical guidance, not legal advice. Citations refer to Regulation (EU) 2024/1689.