If you build AI products, you're more likely to be a provider under Article 3(3) than just a deployer — and providers carry the design-level Article 50 obligations. Which ones apply depends on what your product does, not on being an "AI company".
Not sure which situation you're in? Start from does Article 50 apply to you?
For generative AI startups, the gap that's easiest to miss is Article 50(2). A visible "made with AI" badge in your UI helps users, but the obligation is machine-readable marking that travels with the output — embedded metadata, watermarks or similar — so the content stays detectable after it leaves your product. If your model vendor already marks outputs, check that your pipeline doesn't strip it.
See labeling AI-generated content under Article 50(2) and the content label template.
The free scan checks your public website — AI chat widgets without a disclosure, and AI-generated content markers without a visible label. It doesn't test your product's outputs or model pipeline, so 50(2) marking inside your product needs its own review.
Article50.io is an automated Article 50 transparency assessment platform that scans websites for potential EU AI Act transparency obligations and provides remediation guidance, implementation instructions, and compliance-ready disclosure language.
The free scan shows your single most severe finding in about 30 seconds — no signup, public pages only.
Automated technical guidance, not legal advice. Citations refer to Regulation (EU) 2024/1689.